This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 14:29:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
- References: <20021025133601.8361.pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8361
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-07-24 14:29 -------
I'm not a maintainer, but if asked I'd vote for abandoning the extension as
well. I'm pretty sure more people would think of a bug in the compiler than
an intentional feature if they encountered it in real life.
And, yes, just as Gerald said: 3.4 is _the_ time to get rid of cruft in the
C++ compiler.
W.