This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/11637] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ invalid assembly with -fnon-call-exceptions
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 Jul 2003 22:43:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/11637] [3.3/3.4 Regression]g++ invalid assembly with -fnon-call-exceptions
- References: <20030722222648.11637.nick@ilm.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11637
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c++ |target
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Priority|P2 |P1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-07-22 22:43:08
date| |
Summary|[3.3.1 prerelease] g++ |[3.3/3.4 Regression]g++
|invalid assembly with -fnon-|invalid assembly with -fnon-
|call-exceptions |call-exceptions
Target Milestone|3.4 |3.3.1
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-22 22:43 -------
This looks like a bad regression I can reproduce it on the mainline (20030719) and 3.3.1
(20030707). I think the problem is only when printing out the floating point number.
There might be a way to construct a testcase which does not use -fnon-call-exceptions.