This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11613] attribute unused after label causes error with g++


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11613


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-07-21 14:33:25
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-21 14:33 -------
>From <http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Attribute-Syntax.html>:
An attribute specifier list may appear __after__ the __colon__ following a label, other than a case or 
default label.  The only attribute it makes sense to use after a label is unused.  This feature is 
intended for code generated by programs which contains labels that may be unused but which is 
compiled with -Wall.  It would not normally be appropriate to use in it human-written code, 
though it could be useful in cases where the code that jumps to the label is contained within an 
#ifdef conditional.

Also from that page:
Because of infelicities in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here may not be 
successfully parsed in all cases
I do not know if this should be acceptable in c++.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]