This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug java/11597] java/libjava fails to build in gcc-3.3
- From: "vdaama at earthlink dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2003 04:21:32 -0000
- Subject: [Bug java/11597] java/libjava fails to build in gcc-3.3
- References: <20030719225715.11597.vda@earthlink.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11597
------- Additional Comments From vdaama at earthlink dot net 2003-07-20 04:21 -------
Subject: Re: java/libjava fails to build in gcc-3.3
I am using libc.so.6
I have spent about a month looking at this problem...
I strongly suspect that natNetworkInterface.c was distributed without the
latest set of patches.
Have not as of yet seen any of these patches... but the news groups seem to
think they exist for a similar problem.
The distributed packages seem to pre-date various patches discussed in the
news groups...
Perhaps the "nat?" routines were packaged and released by mistake.
Thanks,
Virgil Anderson
----- Original Message -----
From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: <vda@earthlink.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: [Bug java/11597] java/libjava fails to build in gcc-3.3
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11597
>
>
> pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2003-07-19 23:38 -------
> What glibc are you using?
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.