This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/10170] No warning for "if(foo)" instead of "if(foo())"
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Jul 2003 17:08:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/10170] No warning for "if(foo)" instead of "if(foo())"
- References: <20030320182600.10170.xkinh@yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10170
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-07-19 17:08 -------
Subject: Re: No warning for "if(foo)" instead of "if(foo())"
"sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| Each symbol carries around it's weak status in the compiler, so the warning
| should only trigger if !weak?
Yeah, that should work, I think.
-- Gaby