This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/10504] [3.3] ICE with SSE2 code and -O3 -mcpu=pentium4 -msse2
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Jul 2003 20:08:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/10504] [3.3] ICE with SSE2 code and -O3 -mcpu=pentium4 -msse2
- References: <20030425173609.10504.gbvalor@oxixares.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10504
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2003-07-13 20:07 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3] ICE with SSE2 code and -O3
-mcpu=pentium4 -msse2
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 17:11, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10504
>
>
> steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |mark at codesourcery dot com
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-12 00:11 -------
> This is apparently fixed for mainline, and it is an ice-on-valid-code; also,
> this PR is only in the FSF release, not in the SuSE prerelease they use for SuSE
> 8.2. Probably Jan's fix was in the SuSE tree all along, which would mean this
> is well-tested and therefore safe for 3.3.1. Is there stil ltime for a backport?
Yes, and it would be great to do that!