This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11236] [3.3 regression] ICE (segfault) with a statement containing only the name of a member function


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11236


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW
 GCC target triplet|i386 Linux Debian/sarge     |i386-pc-linux-gnu
   Target Milestone|3.3.1                       |3.3.2


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-13 19:10 -------
I can confirm this on 3.3.1 (20030707).
Here is the backtrace of where it gets stuck:
walk_tree
....
#3511 0x0828cc43 in walk_tree (tp=0xbffeb774, func=0x828b870 <copy_body_r>, 
data=0xbffeb790, htab_=0x0) at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1627
#3512 0x0828bb57 in copy_body (id=0x0) at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:591
#3513 0x0828ca5e in clone_body (clone=0x4009435c, fn=0x19, arg_map=0xbffeb790) 
at ../../gcc/tree-inline.c:1517
#3514 0x080c5056 in maybe_clone_body (fn=0x4008f8c0) at ../../gcc/cp/optimize.c:259
#3515 0x080bfc4f in expand_body (fn=0x4008f8c0) at ../../gcc/cp/semantics.c:2328


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]