This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
- From: "orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 18:26:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/11494] invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal Segsigv
- References: <20030710203416.11494.orrd-bugzilla@vipe.technion.ac.il>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
------- Additional Comments From orrd at vipe dot technion dot ac dot il 2003-07-11 18:26 -------
Subject: Re: invalid suffix "T" on integer cuased internal
Segsigv
Well, it actually says Experimental.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11494
>
>
> steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Priority|P2 |P1
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10 20:54 -------
> Never mind, I found it: gcc 3.3 20021024 (Suse Linux)
>
> Does it still show with 3.3.1pre? That would be a regression from 3.2.2 which
> gives an error similar to the one from 3.4.
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>