This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11440] [3.3 regression] gcc-3.3.1 miscompiles c++ code with -O2, -fno-gcse cures it
- From: "sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Jul 2003 16:46:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11440] [3.3 regression] gcc-3.3.1 miscompiles c++ code with -O2, -fno-gcse cures it
- References: <20030705100217.11440.olh@suse.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11440
sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-11 16:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=4389)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4389&action=view)
Provisional patch
This patch against the 3_3-branch fixes the testcase for me (no
bootstrap/regtest so far). I'm not 100% sure if it's the right place to reject
the note, but it looks reasonable to me. And do I need to reject
STRICT_LOW_PART and SUBREG too?