This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- From: "numerical dot simulation at web dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jul 2003 14:55:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11489] [3.4 Regression] ICE/segfault on legal code
- References: <20030710141450.11489.numerical.simulation@web.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11489
------- Additional Comments From numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2003-07-10 14:55 -------
I cannot accept that you say:
> One of the current problems with the gcc compiler is that it does not have
> a large testsuite so some regressions fall through.
The boost library compiled with -DBOOST_NO_CONFIG is the hottest
testsuite and it is free. I think it only has political reasons (it's not GPL)
that some may refuse this excellent "testsuite" for use with gcc.
OTOH it is the most important piece of C++ code around the world
and _should_ compile without workaround by the end of 2003.
Markus