This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11466] '-mlittle-endian' doesn't work with GCC3.2.3 under Solaris 2.x
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jul 2003 16:01:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11466] '-mlittle-endian' doesn't work with GCC3.2.3 under Solaris 2.x
- References: <20030708141022.11466.Goeran.Jerke@de.bosch.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11466
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at libertysurf dot
| |fr
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-07-08 16:01:12
date| |
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-07-08 16:01 -------
OK, I did some archeology -- these options have been listed in invoke.texi
since the very first revision of this file under doc/invoke.texi. Before
that, the file existed in the gcc subdirectory, and there, the option
description dates back to the very first version, checked in by Jeff Law
in August 1997. So I guess these things predate the egcs era.
Eric, you have recently done all the sparc stuff. The compiler just
complains that this option doesn't exist, even if I give
-mcpu=ultrasparc
so I guess the manual is plain wrong, or what is the answer. I admit that
the manual is at least a) inconsisten (w.r.t. option summary and the sparc
option listing) and b) confusing (w.r.t. which cpu switch has to be given
to allow -mlittle-endian). What do you suggest?
W.