This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jul 2003 10:46:57 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/9079] Inline constant function pointers
- References: <20021228032605.9079.173513@bugs.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-08 10:46 -------
Subject: Re: Inline constant function pointers
On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 00:50 US/Eastern, doko at cs dot tu-berlin
dot de wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de
> 2003-07-08 04:50 -------
> Subject: Re: Bug#173513: Inline constant function pointers
>
> pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
>> Mark this a dup of bug 3713 which was for c++ but now for all
>> languages.
>>
>> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***
>
> I fail to see a resolution to this report. The call to funk is not
> inlined.
This bug was the same bug as 3713 which means that they were the same
bug.
Having two bugs referring to the same bug in the database is usually
not good
because we cannot keep track of which bugs are important and which bugs
or not
and we also cannot keep track of which bugs get fixed, that is why bugs
are
marked as duplicates of each other.
I hope this bug gets fixed for the tree-ssa branch which makes working
on the tree a
lot easier and the it can fold the constant function pointer and then
maybe inline it.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski