This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- From: "ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Jul 2003 06:43:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11386] GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
- References: <20030630221211.11386.ishikawa@yk.rim.or.jp>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386
------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr 2003-07-08 06:43 -------
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs 21.3 failed to install using GCC 3.3, but GCC 3.2.3 works.
> Probably I should be able to find a difference between
> temacs (by GCC 3.2.3) objdump segment listing and
> temacs (by GCC 3.3) objdump segment listing.
>
> bootstrap-emacs (by GCC 3.2.3), and
> bootstrap-emacs (by GCC 3.3).
There will be very likely many differences between the code generated by
these two versions of the compiler. Why not simply run GDB on the core file?
Is that not doable?