This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11393] Initializer of static const float class member is not legal in c++98
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jul 2003 23:23:35 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11393] Initializer of static const float class member is not legal in c++98
- References: <20030701172459.11393.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-07-07 23:23 -------
I certainly concur. The interaction of the flags -std, -ansi, -pedantic is
not at all clear to me, and it would be good if either their relative
meaning if one of the other flags is given, is explained in detail, or
if they are meant to represent orthogonal concepts. One of the questions
here is: does -std=XX define a minimal or a maximal set of things gcc
has to support, as viewed in the presence of gcc extensions?
W.