This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/545] -std=c89 defines macros it shouldn't
- From: "neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Jul 2003 21:03:34 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/545] -std=c89 defines macros it shouldn't
- References: <20000918020601.545.jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=545
------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2003-07-05 21:03 -------
Subject: Re: -std=c89 defines macros it shouldn't
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=545
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-05 20:51 -------
> There's been some serious switch handling overhauls; what's the status of this?
> Currently it's a vague bug with no testcase, so I don't like it. :-)
It's nothing to do with switches, it's a config/ spec problem. It's way
better than it used to be, but it's still a bug.
Neil.