This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11098] [3.3./3.4 regression] [dwarf2] g++ doesn't emit complete debugging information for local variables in destructors
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Jul 2003 15:45:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11098] [3.3./3.4 regression] [dwarf2] g++ doesn't emit complete debugging information for local variables in destructors
- References: <20030605072735.11098.mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11098
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-07-05 15:45:24
date| |
Summary|g++ doesn't emit complete |[3.3./3.4 regression]
|debugging information for |[dwarf2] g++ doesn't emit
|local variables in |complete debugging
|destructors |information for local
| |variables in destructors
Target Milestone|--- |3.3.1
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-05 15:45 -------
With -gstabs, I get the definition, so this is user viewable regression. Also on 2.95.3 with -
gdwarf-2 I get the variable printed so this is true regression.
I do not get the variable printed in the mainline (20030705).