This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11393] Initializer of static const float class member is not legal in c++98
- From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jul 2003 16:43:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11393] Initializer of static const float class member is not legal in c++98
- References: <20030701172459.11393.rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11393
------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-02 16:43 -------
So why doesn't -std=c++98 generate such a warning. I still consider
failure to do that a bug. If I wanted GNU extensions I wouldn't be
using -std.