This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/11357] no conversion of build-in binary operator argument attempted


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11357



------- Additional Comments From daniel dot frey at aixigo dot de  2003-07-01 07:52 -------
Subject: Re: 

Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Daniel Frey <daniel.frey@aixigo.de> wrote:
> 
> 
>>In case you missed it: I just want to let you know that some Core WG
>>members are still discussing what should be the correct behaviour for
>>this case is. See csc++, "Language lawyers: template operator selection".
>>Regards, Daniel
> 
> 
> Is there an open defect report for this item? I could not find it.

As Daveed said in his latest posting, it *will* be opened to track the 
issue.

Regards, Daniel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]