This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug preprocessor/11178] [3.4 regression] preprocessor calls abort on -CC -traditional-cpp
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jun 2003 22:02:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug preprocessor/11178] [3.4 regression] preprocessor calls abort on -CC -traditional-cpp
- References: <20030612200451.11178.cato@df.lth.se>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11178
pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-06-12 22:02:56
date| |
Summary|preprocessor calls abort on |[3.4 regression]
|-CC -traditional-cpp |preprocessor calls abort on
| |-CC -traditional-cpp
------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-06-12 22:02 -------
I can confirm this on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 (from my testsuite results from this morning):
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-06/msg00688.html but what is really funny it does
not fail on Darwin which usually acts like a *BSD in most terms (I think it does not when it comes
to malloc/free though). And it passed on 20030602 <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
2003-06/msg00066.html> but failed on 20030603 <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
2003-06/msg00125.html so it showed up between those two builds.