This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86

From: "Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, lloyd at acm dot jhu dot edu, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:00:33 +0200
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
References: <8B963324-8A66-11D7-A3CE-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305201024360.28116-100000@gandalf.ices.utexas.edu>

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:26:37AM -0500, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> OK, I made the experiment -- and my small snippet still segfaults with 
> both 3.3 and 3.4 checked out an hour or so ago. This is the assembler 
> output I get on my system with present 3.4. I think I'm at a loss for 
> further explanations, but feel free to ask me if you think you have a 
> theory...

Feeding this assembler file into gcc 3.2 on an Intel box works for me
and the program doesn't crash! This might mean that we have an
assembler/binutils problem here.

   Gruesse  Christian

-- 
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with-O3 -fPIC on x86
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

References:
- Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with-O3 -fPIC on x86
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]