This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

other/10777: gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'


>Number:         10777
>Category:       other
>Synopsis:       gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed May 14 06:36:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Shrisha Rao
>Release:        gcc 3.3-prerelease
>Organization:
>Environment:
MacOS X 10.2.6 (Darwin 6.6)
>Description:
When gcc 3.3 is compiled using Apple's gcc 3.1 (December 2002 Developer Tools) it compiles fine with just the usual warnings.  But when it is bootstrapped using itself (i.e., using a gcc 3.3 compiled from Apple's gcc), there is the odd warning message which repeats as often as the flag is used:

gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'

One example:

gcc   -g -no-cpp-precomp -DHAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZERS=0 -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long   -DHAVE_CONFIG_H    -I. -I. -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/config -I../../gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/../include -c insn-recog.c \
  -o insn-recog.o
gcc: unrecognized option `-no-cpp-precomp'

The bootstrap does run to completion nonetheless, and there are no tangible consequences of this warning that I have been able to find.  It still is a wonder why gcc 3.3 does not have -no-cpp-precomp enabled.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]