This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Confirming/Closing GNATS reports
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:10:14 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: Confirming/Closing GNATS reports
- References: <20030506161552.30561.qmail@web41101.mail.yahoo.com>
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> Regarding cross-compilers thought, if the report is of
> an ICE or compiler segfault, is running the
> preprocessed code through a cross-compiler (mainline
> and branch) without a crash sufficient? Thanks,
I'd say it's sufficient for putting the PR in "feedback" state asking
whether a current native compiler can still reproduce the problem and
noting that a cross compiler can't, then closing a month later absent any
feedback that a native compiler still fails. For the more common native
platforms, the contacts listed in the release criteria for testing
prereleases may well also be willing to help test for particular bugs on
those platforms.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk