This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
optimization/10644: float calculation exceeds representation max, only when optimizer is turned on
- From: bird at bainet dot com
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 May 2003 16:38:32 -0000
- Subject: optimization/10644: float calculation exceeds representation max, only when optimizer is turned on
- Reply-to: bird at bainet dot com
>Number: 10644
>Category: optimization
>Synopsis: float calculation exceeds representation max, only when optimizer is turned on
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: wrong-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue May 06 16:46:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Rebecca Bird
>Release: gcc version 3.2.3 (also 3.2.1 and 3.2)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Red Hat Linux 7.2, kernel 2.4.18, on Pentium IV
>Description:
#include <iostream> // ostream
#include <limits> // numeric_limits<T>::max
using namespace std;
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
template<class T> // T = double or float
static T factorial(T value)
{
T fact = 1.0;
while (value > 1.0)
fact *= value--;
return fact;
}
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
template<class T> // T = double or float
static void test(T)
{
cout << "representation max = " << numeric_limits<T>::max() << "\n\n";
cout << "factorial(34) = "<< factorial(T(34)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(35) = " << factorial(T(35)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(170) = " << factorial(T(170)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(171) = " << factorial(T(171)) << "\n\n";
}
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
int main()
{
cout << "factorial limits for floats:\n";
test((float)0);
cout << "factorial limits for doubles:\n";
test((double)0);
return 0;
}
>How-To-Repeat:
The code explores the range of the factorial function for floats vs doubles. When run without optimization:
g++-3.2 factorial.cpp -o test
the code correctly outputs "inf" for arguments > 34 for float instantiation, and "inf" for arguments > 170 for double.
When any optimization level is used, say:
g++-3.2 -O3 factorial.cpp -o test
the double output remains the same, but factorial(float 35) and factorial(float 170) now give incorrect results. Specifically, the float instantiation returns values 1.03331e+40 for 35! and 7.25742e+306 for 170! which are more than the max float = 2.95233e+38.
>Fix:
If I add code to factorial such as:
T fact = 1.0;
ostringstream ist;
ist << fact;
the program produces correct answers even with optimization turned on. However, this slows down the processing time for the factorial routine (and shouldn't be necessary).
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: text/plain; name="factorial.cpp"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="factorial.cpp"
// Show limits of factorial routine for floats vs doubles
#include <iostream> // ostream
#include <limits> // numeric_limits<T>::max
using namespace std;
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
template<class T> // T = double or float
static T factorial(T value)
{
T fact = 1.0;
while (value > 1.0)
fact *= value--;
return fact;
}
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
template<class T> // T = double or float
static void test(T)
{
cout << "representation max = " << numeric_limits<T>::max() << "\n\n";
cout << "factorial(34) = "<< factorial(T(34)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(35) = " << factorial(T(35)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(170) = " << factorial(T(170)) << endl;
cout << "factorial(171) = " << factorial(T(171)) << "\n\n";
}
// -------------------------------------------------------------------
int main()
{
cout << "factorial limits for floats:\n";
test((float)0);
cout << "factorial limits for doubles:\n";
test((double)0);
return 0;
}