This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/10225: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
- From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: aj at suse dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, pthomas at suse dot de, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Mar 2003 09:26:27 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/10225: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
- Reply-to: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, aj at suse dot de, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, pthomas at suse dot de, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
Responsible-Changed-By: rth
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 09:26:26 2003
State-Changed-Why:
It was a bug that 3.2 accepted this. For 3.3 and beyond this
is accepted with the -fms-extensions switch, but not otherwise.
I'll admit the documentation needs clarification, but it's
also true that you'll not find this "feature" documented
anywhere in the 3.2 tree.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10225