This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, mchen at vmware dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, agesen at vmware dot com, mendel at vmware dot com, janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:01:50 -0800
- Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function
- References: <3E7CE228.2090004@student.tudelft.nl>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:22:32PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10171
>
> Janis,
>
> If the patch you identified really breaks stuff, then this PR should be
> in the
> category "target", agree?
Not necessarily; see Jason's comment about how -O2 does some unrolling.
The identified patch might have merely made that change (as far as this
problem is concerned).