This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c/10025: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h


Document it and call it a feature, eh?  I think it's a bug; GCC shouldn't
talk about conflicts with any builtin function if the header file for it
hasn't been included.

This is pretty sad.

Arnold

> Date: 11 Mar 2003 15:07:13 -0000
> To: arnold at skeeve dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
>    nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: bangerth at dealii dot org
> Reply-To: bangerth at dealii dot org, arnold at skeeve dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,
>    gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Subject: Re: c/10025: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h
>
> Synopsis: gcc 3.2.2 recognizes complex functions even without complex.h
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 15:07:12 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
>     This is a gnu extension. The builtin conj function is switched
>     off if you use -ansi or -std=c89.
>     
>     W.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10025


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]