This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion
- From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
- To: Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com>
- Cc: Simon Wright <simon at pushface dot org>, bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Feb 2003 01:07:22 +1100
- Subject: Re: ada/9406: Documentation suggestion
- References: <46FF00B6-473E-11D7-9764-00039344BF4A@gnat.com>
>>>>> "Geert" == Geert Bosch <bosch at gnat dot com> writes:
>> I see your point about partitions though I must say it was far from
>> obvious that I should be looking there. Perhaps the UM should have a
>> reference to the RM.
Geert> I now see what you mean. I agree that the language here could
Geert> be improved. Actually, the language from the Ada RM that I
Geert> quoted seems to be pretty clear, so I think we should borrow
Geert> from that or indeed put in a link (or both).
I'm not an Ada language lawyer, so the scope of this PR is a bit
beyond me now. I will commit the simple grammar fix and then put the
PR back into analysed state so that it can be finished off by one of
you fellows.
Cheers, Ben