This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file
- From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps at hotmail dot com>
- To: <bangerth at dealii dot org>,<gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<suzhe at turbolinux dot com dot cn>,<gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:22:23 +1100
- Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file
- References: <20030226195154.2985.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
I'm wondering if 9805 and this both have a common cause.
Gareth
----- Original Message -----
From: <bangerth at dealii dot org>
To: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>; <gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org>; <nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org>;
<suzhe at turbolinux dot com dot cn>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: optimization/9859: excessive memory consumption on GTK file
> Old Synopsis: gcc 3.2.2 cannot compile gtk-gnutella 0.91.9 with -O2 option
(was bug 9855)
> New Synopsis: excessive memory consumption on GTK file
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 26 19:51:54 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> Confirmed. At one point, memory consumption blows up to
> beyond 300 MB, at which point my small machine gives up.
> Without optimization, memory use stays below 20 MB, so I'd
> say this is a bug.
>
> 3.0, 3.2.x, 3.3 and 3.4 all show this behavior. I don't know
> whether 2.95 does this, too, since it doesn't grok the
> preprocessed sources.
>
> The code is really ugly, one would wish that the GTK people
> had chosen a decent programming language for their project... :-(
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
r=9859
>