This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: inline-asm/7735: omit asm code

From: Sergei Pachkov <spigel at olvs dot miee dot ru>
To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, spigel at olvs dot miee dot ru, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:52:07 +0300
Subject: Re: inline-asm/7735: omit asm code
References: <20030219072955.19467.qmail@sources.redhat.com>

Sorry, I know it is not a bug. Its my mistake. I tried to reorganize my c&asm code and compiler produced a object file nicely.

ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

Synopsis: omit asm code

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 19 07:29:55 2003
State-Changed-Why:
   Not a bug. Your extended asm statements have no side-effects,
   mark them as "volatile" to prevent the optimizer from removing them.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7735

References:
- Re: inline-asm/7735: omit asm code
  - From: ebotcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]