This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c++/9722: g++ 3.4: structure passing bug
- From: snyder at fnal dot gov
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:34:59 CST
- Subject: c++/9722: g++ 3.4: structure passing bug
- Reply-to: snyder at fnal dot gov
>Number: 9722
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: g++ 3.4: structure passing bug
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: wrong-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 17 15:06:01 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: scott snyder
>Release: 3.4 20030210 (experimental)
>Organization:
<organization of PR author (multiple lines)>
>Environment:
System: Linux karma 2.4.19-emp_2419p5a829i #1 Tue Sep 3 17:42:17 EST 2002 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686
<machine, os, target, libraries (multiple lines)>
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc --enable-threads=posix --enable-long-long
>Description:
gcc generates bad code in the function bar() below for the passing
of the structure to foo(). (Amusingly, the problem shows up only
with optimization off and goes away with optimization on --- but only
because foo() gets inlined with optimization on.)
I expect the program to print `4 5 6'. Here is what it actually
prints for me:
$ g++ -o x x.cc
$ ./x
1073820864 1073824136 1073824548
$
Here is code generated for the bar() function (with labels unused here
removed for readability):
_Z3barR1B:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
pushl %edi
pushl %esi
pushl %ebx
subl $156, %esp
movl 8(%ebp), %eax
movl %esp, %ecx
movl %eax, %edx
movl $144, %eax
movl 8(%esp), %esi
movl %eax, 8(%esp)
movl 4(%esp), %edi
movl %edx, 4(%esp)
movl (%esp), %ebx
movl %ecx, (%esp)
call memcpy
movl %esi, 8(%esp)
movl %edi, 4(%esp)
movl %ebx, (%esp)
call _Z3foo1B
addl $156, %esp
popl %ebx
popl %esi
popl %edi
popl %ebp
ret
It looks like the generated code properly copies the structure
to be passed into the stack, but it then overwrites the
first three words (immediately after the memcpy call).
I do not see this failure in the 3.3 branch.
I also do not see the failure if i adjust the source to be
valid C code and use gcc instead of g++.
>How-To-Repeat:
-----------------------------------
extern "C" int printf(...);
extern "C" void memset(...);
struct B
{
int f[36];
};
void foo (B b) {printf ("%d %d %d\n", b.f[0], b.f[1], b.f[2]);}
void bar (B& b)
{
foo (b);
}
int main ()
{
B b;
memset (&b.f, 0, sizeof (B));
b.f[0] = 4;
b.f[1] = 5;
b.f[2] = 6;
bar(b);
return 0;
}
-----------------------------------
>Fix:
<how to correct or work around the problem, if known (multiple lines)>
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: