This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fix latent bug in crossjumping

From: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
To: Josef Zlomek <zlomj9am at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, dalej at apple dot com, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: 13 Feb 2003 14:27:37 +0100
Subject: Re: Fix latent bug in crossjumping
References: <1044994461.2333.60.camel@steven><1045000492.3956.105.camel@steven> <20030213130934.GA20849@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

Op do 13-02-2003, om 14:09 schreef Josef Zlomek:
> Hi,
> 
> gcc creates a reference to an undefined label when compiling the
> attached testcase with "-O -fpic".

You're the man! :-)

If the fix is OK, you can close high priority PRs c/7887, java/8866, and
java/8154.  Two hi-pri bugs gone!

Another suspects are c++/8819, and maybe c/7289 too, but for the latter
unfortunately there is no test case to reproduce the bug :-/

Greetz
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fix latent bug in crossjumping
  - From: Josef Zlomek

References:
- Re: c/8387: [3.3 regression] -finline-limit behavior changed; newinlining flags need doc
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: c/8387: [3.3 regression] -finline-limit behavior changed; newinlining flags need doc
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Fix latent bug in crossjumping
  - From: Josef Zlomek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]