This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/9549: [3.4 regression] [New parser] ICE in regenerate_decl_from_template


> I believe so. Here's what's in the final text:

OK, that explains the confusion. Thanks for pointing this out. (It also 
makes a lot more sense that the lhs must be template-dependent.)

I'll also review the other report you pointed me to.


So as a summary -- there are two bugs:
- the code of this report shows an ICE, which is a regression
- even without the ICE, the code is well-formed, but rejected by
  all versions of gcc since at least 2.95.

Thanks for your assistance
  W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                              www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]