This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/9412: [3.4 regression] incorrect code with -O2 flag, but not -O
- From: Martin Buchholz <martin at xemacs dot org>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:15:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: optimization/9412: [3.4 regression] incorrect code with -O2 flag, but not -O
- References: <20030124230021.2839.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: martin at xemacs dot org
>>>>> "W" == bangerth <bangerth@dealii.org> writes:
W> PS: Martin, how many more Bool implementations do you
W> still have? You're really beating gcc hard with them,
W> given that C++ has a built-in type "bool"... :-))
I've been working on "TypeSafe C++", among other things.
Check out the weird stuff in:
http://m17n.org/martin/writings/typesafe-bool.html
http://m17n.org/martin/writings/template-parameter-constraints.html
http://m17n.org/martin/
Criticisms of my ideas are very welcome.
I'm really hoping someone can shoot holes in my writings before I make
a fool out of myself sending this to Stroustrup & Co.
Martin