This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- From: David Abrahams <dave at boost-consulting dot com>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:59:28 -0500
- Subject: Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- References: <20030112235222.18371.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
bangerth@dealii.org writes:
> Synopsis: dependent type in conversion operator bug
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 12 15:52:22 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> Confirmed. I have no clue what the standard says, but an
> indication that gcc is actually wrong may be given by the
> fact that the code actually compiles when struct voidify
> is having its template removed.
>
> W.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9278
Actually I think you should close this one.
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#18
Confirms that it's not a bug. It's probably a bug that it works when
you un-templatize voidify :(
--
David Abrahams
dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution