This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9171: [3.4 regression] [new parser] trouble with explicit template specialization
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
- Date: 6 Jan 2003 23:10:05 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9171: [3.4 regression] [new parser] trouble with explicit template specialization
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Old Synopsis: [3.4 regression] new parser: trouble with explicit template specialization
New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] [new parser] trouble with explicit template specialization
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 15:10:04 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. Though I'd need a language guru to rule out that
you should instead write
template <> struct A<0>::B {};
instead. (I doubt, and be it only for the reason that when
you do it, 3.3 barfs, and 3.4 double-barfs with a message
that is printed twice.)
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9171