This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9122: qualified name forced to be used in non-public derived class
- From: "ZhenYu Hou" <hou_zhenyu at hotmail dot com>
- To: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 01:17:33 +0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9122: qualified name forced to be used in non-public derived class
- Bcc:
Dear Neil
Sorry to bother you. But I still believe c++/9122 is a bug as the "p" in
class "C" is not an access to the base of "C", but a newly defined pointer.
Please see below:
class A {};
class B : A {
A* pp; // not full qualified, OK!
};
class C : public B {
public:
C(A*);// compiler : `class A' is inaccessible
void f(A*) {} compiler : `class A' is inaccessible
A* p; // compiler : `class A' is inaccessible
::A* p2; // full qualified, OK!
};
I compiled the code with gcc2.95.3, VC7, BC5.5.1, all passed. And I looked
up the C++ standard but have not found anything that forbid the sample code
to compile.
Another point is if "A" in the sample was replace by "::A", all passed, it
seems strange.
Best regards,
HouZhenyu
From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
hou_zhenyu@hotmail.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, hou_zhenyu@hotmail.com,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9122: qualified name forced to be used in non-public
derived class
Date: 2 Jan 2003 05:00:08 -0000
Synopsis: qualified name forced to be used in non-public derived class
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: neil
State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 1 21:00:08 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Not a bug. You're using private inheritance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9122
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail