This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is this a bug?

From: Songtao Chen <songtao at cisco dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:42:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com><4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com>

Hi Neil,

Thanks for replying.

Can you tell me why the parentheses are irrelevant,
any doc to support that?

Songtao

At 09:23 PM 1/2/2003 +0000, Neil Booth wrote:

Songtao Chen wrote:-

> Hi there,
>
> It appears to be a bug to me.

No, i++ returns the value before increment.  Parentheses are irrelevant.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this a bug?
  - From: Neil Booth

References:
- Is this a bug?
  - From: Songtao Chen
- Re: Is this a bug?
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]