This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/7748: Static objects in dynamic library with non-defaultpriority not initialized
- From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: bangerth at dealii dot org, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <jrheath at ca dot ibm dot com>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:02:23 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: Re: c++/7748: Static objects in dynamic library with non-defaultpriority not initialized
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2002 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
>
> > Synopsis: Static objects in dynamic library with non-default priority not initialized
> >
> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->jsm28
>
> I don't even know what code you're talking about. If cvs annotate has
> indicated the last change to it was some global change such as spelling
> fixes or table-driven attributes, you need to find someone who has
> actually worked on that code locally.
Sorry for finger-pointing you.
I'm talking about the SUPPORTS_INIT_PRIORITY flag which is used in
cp/tree.c(handle_init_priority_attribute). The ChangeLogs are not quite
verbose about this, and you "own" the function almost entirely in cvs
annotate. But you're right, in the ChangeLog this appears as a bulk change
for table-driven attributes, sorry.
There are some blank lines which refer to Jason's 1.106 checkin. I'll move
responsibility to him soon, to see whether he's the right person.
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth