This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bug in ggc-page?
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"rth at redhat dot com" <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:13:30 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: bug in ggc-page?
- References: <24830000.1040188811@warlock.codesourcery.com><87ptrzhotd.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> >> The algorithm in use deliberately applies integer overflow on multiply
> >> to perform division.
> >
> > OK, so you're saying Daniel isn't seeing a real problem, right?
>
> I'm saying that, while there may well be something wrong, the
> apparently overflowed values in the inverse_table for orders that came
> from the extra_order_size_table (which is where all the
> non-power-of-two bucket sizes come from) are not a symptom thereof.
Okeydokey.
I'll look elsewhere.
It's not *that* big a deal, since ggc-copy2 will never be in real use.
>
> zw
>