This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt
- From: Felix von Leitner <felix-gcc at fefe dot de>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:57:15 +0100
- Subject: Re: c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt
- References: <20021217000838.29353.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Thus spake bangerth@dealii.org (bangerth@dealii.org):
> State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 16 16:08:37 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> I refuse to work on PRs where I am discriminated against
> for my nationality (which the reporter mistakenly assumed
> to be different from his own), and I think that in general
> gcc is not the place for insult.
I made a bug report and you refuse to even make a feeble attempt to
reproduce it. Instead you first claim that it's an ABI problem (which
is not and I wrote that), then you claim you need more information (you
don't, I included everything that is necessary to reproduce the problem)
and then you claim that I withhold necessary information.
As if this travesty is not enough, now you feel discriminated against?
Is nobody here interested in whether the latest gcc release actually
miscompiles the most widely used C++ toolkit (Qt) on the most widely
used gcc platform (x86-linux) using the recommended flags?
What is the bug report form good for, then?
Is this a technical bug tracking and removal instrument or the personal
playground of some "I don't have the time to try to reproduce your bug,
but maybe you could try running ldd again" weenies?
Sheesh. I could care less whether Mr bangerth here has the time to try
and reproduce my bug report. But I do care whether he sabotages gcc by
closing open bugs he did not even try to reproduce!
Felix