This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*
- From: Richard Zidlicky <rz at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:38:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: c/7872: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*
- References: <20021127154546.394.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:45:46PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
> Synopsis: ICE on legal code, regression from 3.0 and 2.9*
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 27 07:45:44 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> Richard, same here: I don't have an m68k so cannot check your problem.
you can, the bugreport should have enough information to configure the
cross-compiler and all the necessary input to test the problem on any
architecture.
> What happened to the patch you appended? I does not seem
> to have been applied...
Unfortunately untill now I have seen absolutely no response to this
bugreport, thanks for looking at it.
Quite possible my solution is not the correct or best one, I noticed
the problem would also go away if m68k had CLASS_CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE
defined. However the gcc docs describe this as something that should
affect floating point only so I am not sure about this.
Richard