This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/8856: g++ accepts invalid conversion-function-id


> While trying to analyse whether there really is an ambiguity I found
> these bugs. You could probably add the demangler bug as well;
> 
> _ZN1AIfEcvT_IiEEv
> 
> should demangle as A<float>::operator int() (or perhaps
> A<float>::operator T()[T=int]), not as A<float>::operator float<int>().

That's a funny concept: take some reverse engineering (demangling) that 
generates something bogus, and feed this nonsense back into the loop (the 
compiler). It's really surprising that it works here -- let's call it a 
two-way bug :-)

One will rarely find this kind of synchronisation between two bugs, as if 
the authors of the demangler and the parser had conspired...

Cheers
  Wolfgang

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:           bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]