This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/8503: [3.2 regression] strange behaviour of function types
- From: lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, john_maddock at compuserve dot com, lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Dec 2002 14:26:20 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/8503: [3.2 regression] strange behaviour of function types
- Reply-to: lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, john_maddock at compuserve dot com, lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: [3.2 regression] strange behaviour of function types
Responsible-Changed-From-To: lerdsuwa->nathan
Responsible-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Dec 5 06:26:19 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Hi Nathan,
Awhile back you fixed a bug related to DR 295 implementation
on the main trunk with relevant ChangeLog entry below:
2002-09-16 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Remove DR 295 implementation.
* pt.c (check_cv_quals_for_unify): Disable function & method cases.
* tree.c (cp_build_qualified_type_real): Likewise. Don't warn
about ignoring volatile qualifiers.
However the bug is still present in the 3.2 branch
and there are two GNATS report about the problem: PR8503
and PR7774. I've verified that the patch fixes these
bugs. Would you consider applying it for the 3.2 branch
as well?
--Kriang
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8503