This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3

From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:38:25 +0100
Subject: Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20021202163810.056b3008@mail.lauterbach.com><200212012328.27694@enzo.bigblue.local><5.2.0.9.2.20021202163810.056b3008@mail.lauterbach.com>

At 18:41 02.12.2002, Eric Botcazou wrote:

> OK, the addition of Richards patch fixed the regression on
> powerpc-linux-gnu and didn't cause any new regressions on powerpc-linux-gnu
> or i686-linux-gnu.
> I'll re-add Dales patch now and run a full bootstrap again.

So Richard's patch + Dale's patch1 + Dale's patch2 ? I'm going to do a
bootstrap/regtest on K6 then.

Well, Dale's patch1 is already checked in, this was the regression causing one. If that's what you mean, yes, that's what I meant too :-).

My bootstraps on powerpc-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu with this setup completed without regressions.

Franz.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: optimization/8599: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]