This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: other/633: In specs, %{<XXX*} does NOT remove switches from command line
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN <Steven dot Bosscher at usafa dot af dot mil>
- Cc: "'gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org'"<gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'rsandifo at redhat dot com'" <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:29:02 -0800
- Subject: Re: other/633: In specs, %{<XXX*} does NOT remove switches from command line
- References: <15A5B6227F19D311856E00902746453504EE5D44@fsxqpz05.usafa.af.mil>
Bosscher Steven Civ USAFA/DFAN <Steven.Bosscher@usafa.af.mil> writes:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
> r=633
>
> It seems that PR other/633 ("In specs, %{<XXX*} does NOT remove switches
> from command line") was fixed long ago by:
>
> 2000-12-13 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
>
> * gcc.c (handle_braces): Handle %{<S*} spec correctly.
>
> Maybe somebody with GNATS write access can close the bug?
Done.
> But it seems that all occurrences of %{<S*} should be replaced with %<S*
> since the changes on 2002-09-19 by Zack Weinberg.
>
> The %{<S*} spec is still used (or again, actually, was introduced
> 2002-10-15) in config/mips/vr.h: "%{mabi=32:%{<mgp32}}". Is this a bug?
My change is only present on the basic-improvements branch.
config/mips/vr.h does need to be changed there. I have a lot of
delicate changes in my copy of that branch right now -- would you mind
submitting a patch?
zw