This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/8309
- From: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:05:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: target/8309
I've culled a much smaller testcase that fails on the trunk and the
3.2 branch. I'm backsearching the trunk to see when this bug was
introduced, and have found the bug existed back at 2000/02/01, so I'm
starting to think that its going to be "when ColdFire support was
added". I can't edit the PR. Here's the updated testcase:
#define SMALLER_TESTCASE /* make the testcase *very* small */
extern void foo();
void foo(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l)
short a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l;
{
short m,n,o,p,q,r,s
#ifndef SMALLER_TESTCASE
,t,u,v
#endif
;
for (m=0; m<a; ++m) {
for (n=m; n<b; ++n) {
for (o=n; o<c; ++o) {
for (p=o; p<d; ++p) {
for (q=p; q<e; ++q) {
for (r=q; r<f; ++r) {
for (s=r; s<g; ++s) {
#ifndef SMALLER_TESTCASE
for (t=s; t<h; ++t) {
for (u=t; u<i; ++u) {
for (v=u; v<j; ++v) {
#endif
foo2(m,n,o,p,q
,r,s
#ifndef SMALLER_TESTCASE
,t,u,v
#endif
);
}
}
#ifndef SMALLER_TESTCASE
}
}
}
#endif
}
}
}
}
}
}
--
Peter Barada Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard 781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(wholly owned by Motorola) 781-270-0193 (fax)