This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: debug/8094: bad dwarf for inlined constructors
- From: dberlin at sources dot redhat dot com
- To: dberlin at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, tom dot horsley at ccur dot com
- Date: 17 Oct 2002 21:33:23 -0000
- Subject: Re: debug/8094: bad dwarf for inlined constructors
- Reply-to: dberlin at sources dot redhat dot com, dberlin at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, tom dot horsley at ccur dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: bad dwarf for inlined constructors
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->dberlin
Responsible-Changed-By: dberlin
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 17 14:33:23 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
me
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: dberlin
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 17 14:33:23 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Need a test case, for both problems, in order to debug.
Also, when you say "two separate copies of a constructor", do they have the same mangled name?
I suspect one is the in-charge constructor, and one is the not-in charge constructor, and they actually have different names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8094