This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures inexecute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
- From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
- To: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
- Cc: roger at eyesopen dot com, rth at redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures inexecute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209301755160.10986-100000@www.eyesopen.com><200210021446.KAA15315@caip.rutgers.edu>
From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
So what does that mean with respect to addressing the testcase?
Fixable? XFAIL it?
It think it would be rediculious to mark such a simple piece of C code
as XFAIL on any platform. Roger reverted his changes it appears, so
it should pass now.