This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE types and structures

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at redhat dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:24:21 -0700
Subject: Re: SSE types and structures
References: <20020528124507.GM7082@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020528085123.B3044@redhat.com> <20020613163501.GJ19137@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020613093836.A3058@redhat.com> <20020613164009.GK19137@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020613094229.B3058@redhat.com> <20020613171748.GR19137@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 07:17:48PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> ! #define ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN(FIELD, COMPUTED) \
> !   (!TARGET_64BIT && !TARGET_ALIGN_DOUBLE && !DECL_USER_ALIGN (FIELD) \
> !    && TYPE_MODE (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (FIELD)) == ARRAY_TYPE \
> ! 		 ? get_inner_array_type (FIELD) \
> ! 		 : TREE_TYPE (FIELD)) == DFmode \
> !    ? MIN ((COMPUTED), 32) : COMPUTED)

You don't care for XFmode/TFmode.

You should probably look at TREE_CODE == REAL_TYPE and 
COMPLEX_TYPE instead of TYPE_MODE.

What sort of compatibility testing has this received?

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: SSE types and structures
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]