This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
middle-end/6950: gcc 3.0.4 miscompiles cppexp.c
- From: jason at cambridge dot redhat dot com
- To: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 00:52:19 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: middle-end/6950: gcc 3.0.4 miscompiles cppexp.c
>Number: 6950
>Category: middle-end
>Synopsis: gcc 3.0.4 miscompiles cppexp.c
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: wrong-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 06 16:56:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Jason Merrill
>Release: 3.0.4
>Organization:
Red Hat, Inc.
>Environment:
System: Linux prospero.cambridge.redhat.com 2.4.9-31 #1 Tue Feb 26 07:11:02 EST 2002 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: /home/jason/eg/configure --with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/jason/eg/gcc/version.c --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu -v --with-dwarf2 --enable-threads=posix --with-as=/home/jason/s/sw/gas/as-new --with-ld=/home/jason/s/sw/ld/ld-new : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured)
>Description:
In Neil's recent changes to cppexp.c, num_equality_op stores the
result of a && expression into a location which is used in the expression.
gcc 3.0.4 wrongly generates code for this which first stores 0 into the
target, then computes the expression, to poor result.
This bug is not present in 2.95.3, Red Hat 2.96-98 or 3.1.0. I
plan to work around this bug in the trunk sources, but it might still be a
good idea to fix this in a 3.0.5 release.
>How-To-Repeat:
Here is a reduced testcase.
typedef struct cpp_num cpp_num;
struct cpp_num
{
long high;
long low;
char overflow;
};
#define num_eq(num1, num2) (num1.low == num2.low && num1.high == num2.high)
static cpp_num
num_equality_op (lhs, rhs)
cpp_num lhs, rhs;
{
lhs.low = num_eq (lhs, rhs);
lhs.high = 0;
lhs.overflow = 0;
return lhs;
}
int main()
{
cpp_num a = { 1, 2 };
cpp_num b = { 3, 4 };
cpp_num result = num_equality_op (a, b);
if (result.low)
return 1;
result = num_equality_op (a, a);
if (!result.low)
return 2;
return 0;
}
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: